Do the court cards need updating? If not, why not? If so ... how would you update them? Express yourself in the comments by Friday, August 3rd, and you'll be entered in a random drawing for our reviewer's copy of the new Necronomicon Tarot! (When leaving a comment, be sure to enter a working email address in the form -- otherwise, we won't be able to contact you!) The winner will be announced Saturday, August 4th!
Ah, the court cards.
Traditionalists delight in them, arguing that the court cards are tried and true. Some see them as fantasy figures, embodying qualities Westerners first encounter in childhood fairy tales: stern Kings, empathetic Queens, bold Knights, eager Pages. Others claim that royal titles help clients and readers alike adopt a more playful, childlike state of mind.
Revisionists like the idea of court cards, but yearn for a way to improve the court's ability to reflect contemporary roles.
- Shirley Gotthold's Transformational Tarot expands the courts to include the (awkwardly named) Teacher/Student, the Reformer, the Oracle, and the Sage.
- Joseph Earnest Martin's Quest Tarot strikes a more deliberate gender balance with its Father, Mother, Son, and Daughter.
- Catherine Cook and Dwariko von Sommaruga's Songs for the Journey Home abandons gender-based assumptions entirely, substituting functions: Innocence, Awakening, Creating, and Resolving.
- My own Bright Idea Deck associates the courts with four different problem-solving approaches: learning, doing, feeling, and controlling.
So ... how about it? Do you prefer traditional courts? (If so, why?) Do you know of a deck that has a clever way of redefining and revitalizing the court cards? Do you have a personal method for interpreting traditional courts that you feel inclined to share?
Tell us about it in the comments ... and you'll automagically be entered in a drawing for a new copy of Llewellyn's "just in time for Halloween" Necronomicon Tarot!
Recent Comments